Saturday 25 May 2013

Google Just Unleashed Its Penguin 2.0 Update

Earlier this year in April, our good friend Tinil talked about the, then upcoming penguin update. It’s official, Google just released version 2 of Penguin.

The first update literally shook the internet. Webmasters had to re-invent themselves and embrace content marketing. Google is wise and is fully committed to their mission of making the search engines friendly and useful for the user.

Honestly, we’ve had ample time to prepare for this update, as Matt Cutts alluded to it many times. For those who are worried, allow me to soothe you a little bit by saying that it will only affect about 2.5% of the internet.

This update will be more intensive than version 1 of Penguin and is specifically targeting black hat spam. Spammers and black hat SEOs should be worried. If you’ve been focusing on quality content, the user, and haven’t participated in black hat techniques, you ‘need not fear’. :)

Matt Cutts official statement:

    We started rolling out the next generation of the Penguin webspam algorithm this afternoon (May 22, 2013), and the rollout is now complete. About 2.3% of English-US queries are affected to the degree that a regular user might notice. The change has also finished rolling out for other languages world-wide. The scope of Penguin varies by language, e.g. languages with more webspam will see more impact.

    This is the fourth Penguin-related launch Google has done, but because this is an updated algorithm (not just a data refresh), we’ve been referring to this change as Penguin 2.0 internally. For more information on what SEOs should expect in the coming months, see the video that we recently released.

Let us know in your comments below what you think of this update and if you’ve seen the results of it yet.  We’d love examples!

Saturday 18 May 2013

Google Crawling and indexed methods in website

=============   Popularity & Importance   =============

Now - if you actually bothered reading the linked to topics ... you should have seen this comming.

Google only has a certain amount of resources.
It has to allocate those carefully.
It will rate sites, and treat them differently, depending on how it rates them.
It seems to rate them on Popularity/Importance.
Another factor is likely to be Size of the site (number of pages, size of the pages).

This means that if your site is not popular with other sites,
if your page is not well linked to from other pages on your site,
if your page is not linked to from other popular pages on your site,
... then it will not be processed as fast as sites that are more popular, have better internal link structure etc.

And I did mention Size, yes?
Well - the major player here is that larger sites tend to have "deeper" pages (longer URLs, multiple Directories ... and less internal links from Prominent/Important/Popular pages).

There's also the aspect that Popularity only stretches so far.
Your Homepage may havea PR of 5 .... but does that really reach down to http://www.example.com/something/somethingelse/anotherthing/thisheresection/somepage.html ?

Then there may even be the aspect of "Change Rate" ... how often you have been adding/updating your site previously ... G may pre-allocate based on past behaviour?


Now - bearing all that in mind ... the simplest way to look at it is a "tier" system, or levels.
You have X number of pages, with X popularity, and X importance = Y Crawling and Z Indexing times.

Thus;
 - if you are not that popular, you get crawled less often, less pages are crawled and it takes longer to get what is Crawled appearing in the SERPs.
 - if you suddenly end up with a larger amount of content, but your popularity has not gone up at the same sort of rate, then the chances are that you will not be crawled as often/fast as you were, nor indexed as fast.

And - as it seems so many people seem to struggle with this concept ....
(NOTE: The figures/values used are completely made up!)

------------+-------------------+-------------------------|-------|--------------------|-------------------|----------------
   Size   |   Popularity   |   Link Structure  |   =  |   Frequenct   |   Quantity   |   Indexed
------------+-------------------+-------------------------|-------|--------------------|-------------------|----------------
  Small  |       Low        |         Weak        |   =  |    14 days    |         3         |    8 days
------------+-------------------+-------------------------|-------|--------------------|-------------------|----------------
  Small  |       Low        |      Moderate      |   =  |    14 days    |         3         |    7 days
------------+-------------------+-------------------------|-------|--------------------|-------------------|----------------
  Small  |   Moderate    |         Weak        |   =  |    10 days     |         4         |    7 days
------------+-------------------+-------------------------|-------|--------------------|-------------------|----------------
  Small  |   Moderate    |      Moderate      |   =  |      7 days    |         4         |    6 days
------------+-------------------+-------------------------|-------|--------------------|-------------------|----------------
  Small  |       High       |      Moderate      |   =  |      5 days    |         5         |    4 days
------------+-------------------+-------------------------|-------|--------------------|-------------------|----------------
Medium |      High        |      Moderate      |   =  |      7 days    |         4         |    5 days
------------+-------------------+-------------------------|-------|--------------------|-------------------|----------------

Okay - does that help you see what I'm on about?
(NOTE: Again - just to make flamming sure - the figures/values are complete gibberish!!!)
(NOTE: I have Not included Change Frequency, nor accounted for Sitemaps, nor Depth!)

And - here's the reall killer part about the Crawling ....
Google doesn't only crawl New things does it ... it also recrawls old things!
So though you may get 8 pages crawled - how many are likely to be "new" ones?

Wednesday 15 May 2013

How to Shift From Guest Posting to Content Marketing in 6 Basic Steps

Perhaps you have been doing guest posting for a while. Regardless of what you may have read about the next major release of Google's Penguin algo, fundamentally, guest posting remains a sound concept. In fact, link building is still legal (the referenced post was +1'ed by Google's John Mueller), you just have to go about it the right way.

This may mean you need to make some changes. If you've been guest posting solely to obtain links, without regard to any other benefit, here's how to make the shift into a high value content marketing campaign.

1. Aim High

You can keep guest posting, honest you can. But, you may need to pick your targets differently.
Major media/blog sites are always hungry for content. Some of these sites do accept guest posting content. It is easy to check to see if they do, with a search query such as: [site:nytimes.com "guest post"] (without the []):
ny-times-guest-posts
The big key to this is to find sites where the editorial policy is highly respected and the search engine trust for the site is likely to be very high. If you historically pursued guest posts solely for purposes of getting links, most probably with rich anchor text, than chances are that the sites you posted on don't have that high a level of trust with the search engines.
In fact, rejoice when you find a site that won't allow rich anchor text in the post or the attribution. This by itself is a decent signal of a strong editorial policy.

2. Think About a Column

 

If you are locked into the world of PageRank and rich anchor text, chances are that you would view publishing multiple articles with the same site as a waste of time. Classical PageRank thinking would lead one to believe that repeat posts at the same site would have diminishing value. However, it is time to invert that thinking.
Let's get human for a minute. Imagine I told you I got an article published in the New York Times (I haven't, but that is why I said "imagine"). You would be impressed, right? Now, imagine I told you I had a column with the New York Times. Which one impresses you more? No question that it is the column that creates the greatest human impression.
Let's draw the analogy out a little further. Imagine I told you that I had published articles in 15 different newspapers, including one in the New York Times, and one in the Washington Post, along with 13 other decent quality sites. Which impresses you (as a human) more, this shotgun blast approach, or the idea that I had a New York Times column.
I still vote for the column, as it is a much stronger indicator of a very high level of trust to hae a column than to get one placement. And, trust me (pun intended), the search engines are likely to look at it the same way as they want to understand how people value things as a basis for their algos.
Oh, and if you have a column in the New York Times, it's probably far easier to get other people on other sites interested in publishing your articles than if you don't.

3. Establish Authority

Where you publish is one component of this, but the other major component is what you publish. It has to be new and interesting and help people understand something they didn't understand before.
In general, you won't become famous for writing a new article on "mortage tips":
intitle-mortgage-tips
However, the topic doesn't always need to be totally new. Suze Orman has made a career of making information that has been published thousands of times before more digestable and understandable for the many. But, she still achieved prominence through unique packaging of the content and her personality.
How can you measure your progress in developing authority? Here are a few metrics to look at:
  1. Where are you publishing and how often? This is one of the reasons to Aim High and Think About a Column.
  2. Are you getting the tweets/+1s/shares/Likes/comments? I don't believe that any of these metrics is the "new link", but, they provide an excellent way to for measuring audience engagement, and hence the authority of an author.
  3. Are you getting speaking engagements? This may not seem like a search engine measurable metric, but you can measure it, and you should. Do people want to hear what you have to say? If they do, then the social sharing and high quality writing opportunities will likely follow.
  4.  

4. Build Strong Social Media Presences

This is just basic common sense PR. Sharing your published content through your social channels can provide a beautiful virtuous circle like this one:
authority-synergy
Many people think that the size of your social channel is another way you can measure the development of your authority over time. Don't try to artificially inflate your followings though, as that is a false indicator.
Any social media site or search engine can see the number of interactions you get per follower, or measure the ratio of you many followers to following you have. Strong social media presences are more about the engagement that takes place with your content than it is the volume of followers and friends.

5. Influence Influencers

Relationships with influencers can add a great deal to your overall content marketing campaign. For one thing, they act as accelerators for the virtuous circle we spoke of in the previous point:
authority-influencer-acceleration
The key here is to do more than just meet them, you have to bring enough to the table so they see value in the communication with you. Perhaps like Suze Orman you simplify complex concepts. Or, you may be valued for your analytical skills, or you may conduct groundbreaking research.
It is particularly useful if you can help them solve problems that the influencers have. These may be simple questions they ask in their blog articles or on social media, but anything you can do to attract their attention is great.
One you get to the point where you begin to help or influence them, your social share rate by them is likely to increase. Be aware that these relationships require maintenance. You need to keep influencing them, and if that influence fades, so does their response.

6. Relate

It is great to work on developing your connections with influencers, but there has to be more to it and than that. You have to help others. To use a Twitter example, someone with 600 followers may not be a major influencer, but the community will notice if you help them out, and you will create a very powerful fan in the process.
Your efforts shouldn't only be about you or about the influencers (though both are important), but how you play a role in the larger community. Find a way to relate to the community as a whole, and this is a sure way to grow your overall authority.

Summary

There is a lot more that goes into a fully built out content marketing strategy, but there are the major foundation components. From an SEO perspective, all this work relates to making yourself an organic link magnet. As an authority, with great visibility, and publishing great content, you will get links.
Your content will be the stuff that everyone wants to reference, and these are the type of links that Google wants you to get. Organic. Citations. Pure as gold.

Can the SEO-PR Love Affair Survive After Panda & Penguin?

The SEO industry has been in bed with press releases since online links and keywords were born. It was more than dating. It was a hardcore relationship that was sometimes viewed as abusive by the search engines.

Some called it a match made in heaven; SEO and press releases went together like peanut butter and jelly.

And then a scandal erupted.
Google’s latest Penguin and Panda algorithm updates hit, turning the online marketing world upside down...or maybe right side up. Gone are the days of SEO “press release” strategies of write it, optimize it, distribute it and take an SEO power nap.

SEO + PR = Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow

“We distributed press releases and picked up thousands of backlinks,” said one Internet marketing consultant.
Cool, but what is the big picture? Are we looking at quantity or quality? Google is asking the same thing and the answer is quality, relevant, newsworthy content.

“The big danger to issuing SEO press releases post-Panda/Penguin is that today it matters where your links and press releases end up. If you generate links from 'bad neighborhoods on the Internet' you can end up with the SEO equivalent of a black eye,” said Mickie Kennedy, founder and president of eReleases.com. “That's why I say focus on the press release for what it was intended: the media.”

So if SEO and PR want to continue having a healthy relationship, what’s an online marketer to do? The optimized press release is still a good candidate for online marketing, but the peace, love, and SEO days are over on Google.

Technically, Google is the media in this case, but this doesn't mean press releases won’t work on the search giant. There still is an SEO value proposition and component to press release distribution that deliver newsworthy stories to targeted media and users in a well-written fashion.

SEO Press Release Tips

  • Stick to higher end distribution services that issue the press releases over a true newswire such as Marketwire, PRWeb, PRnewswire, BusinessWire, e-Releases and social PR hybrid services such as PitchEngine.
  • Work with content partners and sites Google considers to be good neighbors.
  • Remember the traditional press release has the main purpose of garnering the attention of a journalist from a bona fide media outlet that can tell your newsworthy story to his or her audience.
  • Write for the journalist, the search engines, the customer, the prospect and the social media news networks. This might require several versions of the same press release.
One way to look at it is like this: The online media outlets are the search engines and social networks. If you look at these channels as media outlets, the websites or users are the potential writers or editors. You want the most influential media to cover your news within that search engine or social channel.

The New Media Outlets

  • Google
  • Yahoo
  • Bing
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • LinkedIn
Is there hope for the over-used and abused press release when it comes to an online marketing strategy? Yes, professional online marketers share new press release SEO strategies that are actually not so new, according to SEO expert Joe Laratro.

Google’s New Rules and SEO for PR Old Rules

Press releases for SEO have always had a set of best practices for search marketing, but with Google’s new updates it is more important than ever to follow the rule book and avoid the possibility of Google’s duplicate content issues.

Press Release Distribution Tips

Avoid duplicate content by having multiple versions of a press release.
  1. Wire version
  2. Website blog version
  3. Social media version
Each version should be at least 20-30 percent different from each other and ideally contain different links.

Link Building with Press Releases

  • Don’t go crazy with 15 links. Include one or two links in the wire version, and different links in the blog/web versions.
  • Use different distribution services. Mix it up so the content is coming from different sources - not always the same.
  • “Instead of just using exact match anchor links, better to diversify anchor text by using branded and non branded keywords,” says Peter Leifer President and CEO of PrimeView Interactive marketing agency.

PR’s New Lover: Google Authorship

Laratro also pointed to Google’s authorship tag as a press release strategy. TechCrunch’s Rip Emerson said it like this:
There are a whole mess of reasons why Google Authorship is important. For starters, it lets those who create the web’s content (author's note: this could mean press release content) claim that content by allowing them to add their name and image next to the byline of their articles, blogs, (press releases) etc. That content stands out in the search results.

SEO and Press Releases - Still a Happy Couple

Press releases are a key vehicle for link building strategies for many companies, noted Sharon Virtue, SEM Strategy Director of Marketwire.
“While Penguin doesn’t change that, online marketers need to be more mindful of the quantity and quality of links inserted into a press release,” Virtue said.
To avoid getting caught in the algorithm, here’s a few quick tips for the post-Penguin world of creating press releases:
  • Fewer and more quality links; meaning relevant to the subject of the release, from authoritative sources.
  • Avoid using the corporate boilerplate as a means to systematically insert several links, always using the same anchor text.
  • Have no more than one link to the same URL.
  • Avoid using the same anchor text more than once in any release.
Well, you could say that the relationship between SEO and press releases is in a healthy state of rehab. With Google’s blessing, the relationship will continue to work.
Catch up with Lisa Buyer at SES San Francisco on the panel Social Media that Won’t Break the Bank.

10 Reasons Why Public Relations is a ‘Must-do’ for SEO in 2013

Many people today recognize that search engine optimization (SEO) and public relations (PR) have much to offer each other.

The latest Google changes have put a real emphasis on high quality, unique content that is linked to by quality sites. And this is where real public relations – as opposed to crappy news release distribution – can play such a crucial role.

There are real opportunities for great business. What follows are 10 reasons why SEOs should really get to grips with PR in 2013, based on my conversations with the people who are making the two work together.

1. The PR Industry is Definitely ‘Getting it’

Most of us who have been in link building for a while have in the past experienced a certain degree of frostiness from the PR industry. But that is clearly changing and people are breaking out of silos.
Mike Cherenson is a former Chair and CEO of the Public Relations Society of America (PRSA) and is EVP of Success Communications Group. He sees the importance of SEO and link building.
“Authentic and relevant link building, aimed at driving engagement, informing publics and building mutually beneficial relationships should be a part of every public relations and SEO effort," Cherenson said.

But not only should link building be a part of every public relations effort, public relations also has much to offer SEO.

“Public relations professionals are skilled storytellers and content generators and should be a part of every SEO effort," he said. "The future of SEO is not in the technology, it’s in the ability to tell stories that readers and Google will find interesting… and that’s public relations.”
And Cherenson understands the value of linking.
“Links need to provide value to the reader," he said. "Media will be more likely to link to content that is compelling and provides information that goes beyond the original reporting.”
Another PR professional is Ken Deutsch, EVP of JPA, a healthcare communications firm and a seasoned specialist in public affairs.

His company takes SEO and link building very seriously. But that’s still not the case throughout the industry.

“Many PR people stop at getting media coverage and think their job is done. They get a placement in the New York Times but they don’t follow up to make sure a link is put in. So they’re not taking advantage of the SEO side of the story.”

And while many media outlets provide links, there are some that don’t link out as a matter of policy.
That influences the targets he goes after, “because they don’t put links in, it’s not worth putting as much energy into getting placement there.”

2. There is a Tremendous Synergy Between SEO and PR

Putting it simply, SEO enhances a press release. Use popular keywords and the press release, never mind any stories it generates will continue to bring search engine traffic. And the editorial links the press release generates bring direct click-throughs and lead to higher rankings.

Public relations enhances SEO by focusing on what’s newsworthy, crafting a great story, finding editorial opportunities, getting coverage and building relationships with reporters and editors. And of course, they got the negotiation skills to ask for a link without really asking for a link.

“PR helps SEO directly by increasing branded traffic," said Lindsey Kirchoff, a Media and Speaker Relations specialist at HubSpot.com. "We always see a bump in branded traffic after a big campaign! Indirectly, PR helps SEO generate inbound links from quality sources that not only gets first-touch exposure to new audiences, but credibility in the eyes of search engines.

“SEO grounds PR with hard, measurable data. PR has always been notoriously difficult to pin down, but SEO adds hard numbers to the equation. I also think that SEO allows PR to be less isolated from the rest of the team – sometimes PR can feel like an island. SEO helps PR connect their work to the rest of the company's business goals.

“Finally, SEO establishes credibility for PR for keywords. You look much more credible to a news source if you come up high for the term they are reporting on!”

3. Editorial Links Bring a Big SEO Boost

Most PR links are extreme quality links, according to Jordan Brannon, the SEO guy at Coalition Technologies. Why? "Because getting them is not a free for all – you have to earn your media placements,” he said.
But the rewards are worth the effort.
“If you get 200 high quality editorial links, it’s worth more that 20,000 low quality links,” Brannon said.

However, most reporters work to a deadline and you have to be swift in your response to get in.
“Most editorial opportunities are time sensitive and you need to act quickly. That means you need to have the authority to reply on the client’s behalf," Brannon added. "And you have to have an email account on your client’s domain – it’s not good saying you’re a marketing agency.”

Will Marlow was formerly a Press Secretary for two congressmen before founding a company that specializes in search engine marketing. He knows that to get those all-important editorial links, sticking to deadlines is crucial.

“You need to understand that you’re dealing with someone who has a hard deadline. It’s like a train going by in the night and there’s one open boxcar that can take you wherever you want to go," Marlow said. "But jump too early and the reporter won’t write about you: jump too late and the reporter won’t write about you. You got to get it just right.”
And it’s not unusual to miss opportunities.

“If an SEO was learning from any PR guy, they would all have stories about how they missed opportunities because someone internally didn’t get back to them or didn’t give the reporter what they need," Marlow said. “If the reporter wants to talk to the CEO and the CEO is playing golf, then you’re not going to get the story. So you’ve got to collaborate with people within the company and make sure that the right people are available.”

4. There’s a Big Cascade Effect

Journalists will often quote, comment or enlarge upon other journalist’s work. Bloggers are also constantly citing other stories.

So if you get your story covered in one prominent media outlet, you’ll quickly see a cascade of similar stories and links spring up.

You’ll get links you never even asked for.
Miranda Miller wrote about How Google Rakes In Over $100 Million in Search Advertising Daily, based on research from Larry Kim of WordStream.

In writing that report, Kim was directly targeting the Wall Street Journal for a link – and succeeded. The story really benefited from the cascade effect and attracted coverage and links from literally hundreds of quality media outlets.

5. You Win Bragging Rights For Your Client

Clients just love to write “As featured in ..." on their website, whether its the Washington Post, Inc. Magazine, or whatever.

That builds consumer trust in their brand and makes it more likely they’ll buy.
And you also increase trust from other reporters. If you’ve already been quoted or covered by a respected publication, then other reporters will think you’re a safe bet to write about, too.

6. PR Skills Can be Learned – or at Least Understood – Easily

Kirchoff has this advice for SEOs who know little about PR:
“SEO experts should think of PR as a way to build strong referral links – something that should be on their radar already. If you have a PR expert in the office, start by taking them out to lunch and chatting. After all, PR is all about building relationships.”

But of course, learning about public relations will help you understand the process – but it might teach you that there’s a lot you don’t know. If that’s the case you might do better to partner with a PR resource.

7. It’s Easy to Partner With an Up and Coming PR Person

Mona Moore is an SEO who has teamed up with a small PR company, Hepner Communications, to pitch their services together.

“I think SEOs are always so focused on getting those links back to the client, we sometimes forget how important it is to nurture those long-term relationships necessary to continue working with specific media outlets,” Moore explained. “And PR reps are great at finding opportunities - but, they don't always take full advantage of those opportunities from an organic SEO standpoint. By working together, SEOs and PR people are able to maximize exposure to a higher level than either of those entities by itself.

Joel Gross, who works with Brannon at Coalition Technologies, describes himself as the SEO tech guy.

“I know how to build and code websites so that they are search engine friendly, and I understand that in order to achieve visibility and revenue for our clients we need to build high quality links and work in tandem with traditional and social media," Gross said. “I know what needs to be done, but Jordan is able to bring in the creative aspect and wow factor that is needed in order to gain the attention and keep it focused where it needs to be. He devises how we frame the content and package it for the consumer in the most digestible and memorable way.

“The best advice I’d give to an SEO would be to get to know your client’s people, their background and story, what’s unique about the company," Gross said. “And remember, this is news and human interest so your stories don’t always have to be selling product. You can have perfectly good story and link from a story on say, ‘work places that are pet friendly’!”

8. You’ll Build Media Contacts That You Can Use Time And Time Again

Contacts are essential both to PR people and to reporters.
“One mistake I made at the start was sending out too much poor stuff," Kim said. "Blasting out press releases is over-rated. What you need to do is get to know the reporters or bloggers you’re targeting.
“Read their articles every day, get a sense of what they’re interested in and only approach them with what you know they’ll be interested in,” Kim continued. “Start small and work your way up. Once you’ve built a relationship, they’ll start contacting you.”

He said he has found that PR is the fastest way to generate those backlinks on related industry websites, but you’ve got to go past distribution services and build your own contacts.
“We are diligent in keeping a database of related editors here," Kim said. "So we're sending press releases directly to the editors and not through a service. However, we also post the press releases to PRweb or PRnewswire to get the added Internet news site exposure (i.e., Yahoo News)."

Kim said those personal relationships increase the chances of coverage so much it’s "unreal."
"We now get lots of calls from editors who ask – is there an engineer over at such and such a company that we could talk to?" Kim said. “Now, when they see our press releases, they always read them. And they’re more likely to publish them because we’ve been helpful.

If you’re an SEO who new to PR, the best place to start is by reading the editorial guidelines of the publications you’re targeting, Kim advised. Then you know what they’re looking for and can pitch accordingly. Don’t pitch something they clearly don’t want.
And don’t forget editorial calendars – you can see months in advance what the publications are going to be covering.

9. It Strengthens and Extends Your Relationship With the Client

If you learn how to do proper public relations effectively or bring in a competent professional that you work well with, then you increase the respect your client has for your work. That can only strengthen your relationship and help ensure that they’ll stay with you.

10. It Opens up Additional Income Streams

It probably goes without saying that with the increasing interest in this area, it should offer some profitable and additional income streams to your agency.

There are tremendous publicity and quality links available through effective public relations. You’ll probably have failures to start with but if you keep at it, your skills will grow and you’ll get the benefits.

How do you cope with failures?
“I don’t believe in failures – it’s a matter of setting your expectations," Kim said. "You can’t start out and immediately get coverage on CNN. Far better to pick a local target and learn from it. Every time you do it, you have more experience. Say you approach 10 journalists and you get nothing but two reply and say I’m not interested because it’s not exactly what I do – you’ll get a better idea of what will work next time.”

Link Data Analysis - A Beginner's Guide

Boy, do I love link data. I love generating a list of backlinks and digging through them to get an idea of what a client has so that I can figure out what a client needs to do. I love all the cool charts that certain tools give you and I really, really love slapping in some competitors and making comparisons.

However, I've been dealing with link data for years and it all makes sense to me. What if it's your first time? What do you do with all this data?

I've divided this post into three sections: how to get the data, how to analyze it, and how to quickly see if you have problems.

How to Get Link Data

All of the following tools are user-friendly and make getting a list of your link data quite straightforward:


While Google and Bing's tools are good for giving you an idea of what those engines see as your backlinks, you'll probably be better off using a more robust link tool for analysis, as they don't give you all the information that you might want.

How To Analyze The Data

Make sure your tool of choice can give you the following pieces of information:
  •     URL linking to you.
  •     Page the URL links to on your site.
  •     Anchor text used.
  •     Whether the link is nofollowed or followed.

If you can get information on whether the link is an image or a text link, that is helpful but not necessary.

Here are a few basic steps to follow when looking at a backlink profile:

1. Check Anchor Percentages: Brand/URL, Money, Compound, and Other

Here's what you're looking for:

  •     Brand/URL anchors: These are terms that use your brand name or URL as the anchor text (e.g., "Search Engine Watch", "searchenginewatch.com")
  •     Money anchors: These are the terms you or your client really wants to rank for (e.g., "blue widgets").
  •     Compound anchors: These are combinations of anchors (e.g., "blue widgets from Search Engine Watch", which combines money and brand anchors).
  •     Other: Any anchors left over.

How can you do this? Some tools do it for you (Link Research Tools lets you categorize each anchor and will report the percentages) but if you're doing it on your own, you have a lot of work ahead of you if it's a large profile.

Each anchor needs to be assigned to a category so you can figure out the percentages. Majestic has a nice little pie chart that shows you anchors and percentages so check whatever tool you're using and see if the data it gives you is sufficient for your purposes.

You might not need to categorize every individual anchor if you only have 100 backlinks and most of them are similar.

What can you do with the info? Use it to see if anything looks strange and dig into it.

This is where competitive analysis can be very useful.

For example, if you have 65 percent money anchors, 25 percent brand/URL anchors, and 10 percent other, you might think that's too heavy a reliance upon money anchors. However, if you analyze five competitors and they all have 75 percent money anchors, it might tell you that you're better off than you thought you were. If you have 10 percent money anchors and everyone else has 50 percent, you could go after more money anchors, to give another example.

The thing to remember here though is that there really is no standard for these percentages. Some industries and brands can get away with different things. Use these numbers only to help you make plans, not as the sole way you formulate them.

2. Look at Ratio of Homepage Links to Deep Page Links

As mentioned above, competitive analysis will show you what the standard was for the industry.

In some cases, a homepage might have barely any links, but subpages have a ton of great ones, and the competitors show the same pattern. Or the homepage may have 99 percent of the links and barely any of the subpages get any good ones.

It may be or may not be a natural linking pattern. You need to get the ratios and see if yours differ substantially from those of others in the same niche.

How do you do this? Grab a list of the linked-to pages on your site and compare the list of deep page links to the list of links to the home page. Link Research Tools gives you a Deeplink ratio, but you may have to calculate this on your own.

deeplink-ratio-link-research-tools

What do you do with the info? If everyone else has a lot of great deep links and you have none, that would be an area to work on for the future. If everything looks good and is consistent with your competitors, then you could keep on doing whatever you've been doing.

3. Perform Geolocation Analysis

The biggest reason to look at this is to help identify potential issues. For example, one of the last profiles I looked at was a U.S. site that shipped its product only to U.S. customers, but more than 65 percent of their links were from sites outside the U.S. (mainly in Asia) and were on foreign-language sites. They had decent PR so a quick PR check wouldn't have immediately alerted me to them, but seeing the hosting country did, and yes, they were all spammy links.

How do you do this? Depending upon the tool, you can get this information from top-level domain (TLD), hosting location, country popularity, or other tabs that list the info you need. Majestic has a very cool map:
majestic-seo-map
majestic-seo-map

What can you do with the info? See if anything looks odd.

If you're a U.S.-hosted site targeting U.S. customers and the majority of your links come from sites in India, you should definitely take a closer look at that. If you're targeting Australian users and your hosting is set up there but all your links are on U.S. sites, again, that doesn't look quite right.

Look for anything that doesn't look natural, basically. If you're targeting users for country-specific searches, this info can be extremely valuable.

4. Check Out the Sitewides

Sitewide links can be completely fine. There are relevant blogroll links, for example.

However, sitewides can be quite spammy. You've surely run across sites that have a footer full of 100 unrelated links or a blogroll that has 20 links to payday loans sites mixed in with links to eco blogs and a few gambling companies.

My main concern with sitewide links is that it's very difficult for any tool (or algorithm) to determine if they are actually relevantly and naturally placed links. You would be amazed at the amount of people who insist that they have a fantastic link profile because they have 18,000 links, but in reality, those links are coming from 500 different domains. That's a lot of sitewides.

How do you do this? Ahrefs has a nice little pie chart and they list out the numbers:
sitewide-ahrefs1      sitewide-ahrefs2
sitewide-ahrefs2

In any tool, you can simply make the calculation yourself by dividing the number of referring domains into the total number of backlinks.

What can you do with the info? Figure out what your percentage of sitewide links is. If it's extremely high, you should consider going after non-sitewide links so that the percentage gets diluted.

I can't say that I have ever seen enough concrete examples of which percentages are good and which are bad though, but if the bulk of your links are from sitewides, you might encounter a problem down the road. Many penalized profiles tend to have a lot of spammy sitewide links on networked blogs.

It's difficult for a machine to determine whether those are actually good or bad links. If you have mostly sitewide links and they get hit next, you'll be looking at problems similar to those faced by people who relied on networks for their backlinks.

Note: if you use more than one tool for analysis, realize that many use their own databases for the information, while some will pull from a variety of sources, so getting the exact same numbers from multiple tools doesn't usually happen. That's completely natural, but you should find a go-to tool and stick with it so you can use the information for trending purposes.

How To Nail Down Problems

Link Research Tools' Link Detox and the Link Risk tool are great to run down a list of your potentially problematic links, but before you pursue removal, have a look at those links first. Data isn't always 100 percent correct.

How do you do this? Link Risk lets you upload a list of the links you want to check (so you have to pull a csv file yourself from another tool like Majestic) whereas Link Detox just requires you to enter a URL.
linkrisk
linkrisk

What do I do with the data? Look for potential problems:

  •     Overly high anchor percentages for money phrases.
  •     High percentage of sitewides.
  •     Too many links coming from geographic area way outside your range or in foreign languages.
  •     Too many links from sites not indexed in Google.
  •     Too many links from networked sites

Now, in my opinion, the information given in both of these tools is somewhat dangerous. If you know what you're doing and you actually think about what you're seeing, you're going to be much better off than someone who immediately runs to have any risky links removed.

Both tools do a great job of narrowing down where problems may be. However, you should always manually review the links shown as being risky ones.

For example, when I ran a profile for a site I own in Link Risk, one of the most offensive links (in the tool's eyes) was what I consider to be one of our best links. It drives traffic and is relevant.

Obviously no tool like that can determine what benefits you may be getting from a link. They can only use available metrics and make determinations based on those numbers, which are usually pretty accurate from my experience, but certainly not always.

If you see links listed as high risk or toxic and you've checked them out manually and aren't getting any benefit from them, you might want to pursue their removal. There are differing opinions about cleanup and I can say that it's very, very tedious, but if you have very few links and many of them are toxic ones, you would probably be better off removing them.

Link Analysis: Dive Right In

The amount of link data available to you really is amazing isn't it? It's also overwhelming.

Even though I wade through tons of link data every week, I still feel a slight sense of panic about it when I grab it and see all those rows in my spreadsheet. The tools available today just keep getting better, too, but the types of reporting they can do can add to that overwhelmed feeling.

My advice? Just take a deep breath, look at what you have, and dive right in.

Tuesday 14 May 2013

Google's Major Penguin Update Coming In Weeks. It Will Be Big!


On Friday, Google's head of search spam, Matt Cutts announced on Twitter that the Penguin update we are expecting this year, will be coming in the next few weeks.
Matt Cutts said, "we do expect to roll out Penguin 2.0 (next generation of Penguin) sometime in the next few weeks."

This has sent shockwaves through the webmaster and SEO industry over the weekend. We know the next generation Penguin update is a major revision to the existing one. Matt said the previous ones were minor updates. To take you back, we had an update on May 24, 2012 and October 5, 2012. Matt said on Twitter that those were more minor, he would have named them 1.1 and 1.2 and that Google is naming this new update version 2.0.

We are calling it the 4th update to Penguin, but yea, this is expected to be huge. We past the anniversary of the Penguin update and many SEOs and webmasters have yet to recover.
Now with the next generation update, many SEOs are hopeful of recovery but terrified that their efforts will end up being futile. Why? Well, even if they did manage to clean up their sites and do everything to warrant a release of the initial Penguin algorithm, with the new algorithm in place, who knows what else they may have triggered.

Danny Sullivan has an excellent write up on this Penguin release and the history around it.
Trust me, I will be all over this when I see signs in the forums about this update. So stay tuned, brace yourself and trust me - webmasters will survive and grow from this.
Forum discussion at Google Webmaster Help, WebmasterWorld and DigitalPoint Forums.

Update: Here is a video from Matt Cutts where he talks about Penguin 2.0, and many other topics. It was released today:

Thursday 2 May 2013

3 Tips for Fast Google Indexing

If you have a new website then it takes some time until Google visits your web pages. Even if you submit your website to Google via their regular submission form, it usually takes weeks until Google visits your site.


There are some things you can do so that Google indexes your web page within 48 hours and not within weeks.

Tip 1: Get a link from an existing site

Links are very important for high rankings on Google. The more (quality) links you have, the higher Google will rank your pages.

An easy way to get a link to your website is to join a forum that is related to your website. Participate in the discussions and sign your posts with your name and a link to your website.

Make sure that you do not spam the forums. Only participate in an online discussion if you really have something to say about the topic. If you post in a well known forum then Google will quickly pickup the link to your site.

Tip 2: Create an external blog

Google likes blogs and many blogs are indexed very quickly. Use Google's Blogger.com service to create a blog that is related to your business.

Ads by Google
Write a few posts and add a link to your website in your blog posts. Google will quickly index your Blogger blog and find the link to your site.

Tip 3: Get as many links as you can

The more other websites link to your website, the sooner Google will find your site. Use IBP's link building tool ARELIS and IBP's directory submitter to get as many links as possible.

If you use all of these methods, it's very likely that Google will index your website within 48 hours.
Links on the other pages make sure that Google finds your website more quickly. The more links point to your website, the more likely it is that Google will find your site. In addition, you will get higher rankings if many other pages link to your site. Further information on how to get high quality links can be found in our free link building eBook.

Security issue in Website Optimizer

 SEO Services Provider

Dear SEO Friends,

Today I received one below email from Google Website Optimizer:
Dear Website Optimizer user,

We are writing to inform you of a potential security issue with Website Optimizer. By exploiting a vulnerability in the Website Optimizer Control Script, an attacker might be able to execute malicious code on your site using a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attack. This attack can only take place if a website or browser has already been compromised by a separate attack. While the immediate probability of this attack is low, we urge you to take action to protect your site.

We have fixed the bug, and all new experiments are not susceptible. However, any experiments you are currently running need to be updated to fix the bug on your site. Additionally, if you have any Website Optimizer scripts from paused or stopped experiments created before December 3, 2010, you will need to remove or update that code as well.

There are two ways to update your code. You can either stop current experiments, remove the old scripts, and create a new experiment, or you can update the code on your site directly. We strongly recommend creating a new experiment as it is the simpler method.

Creating a New Experiment

1. Stop any currently running Website Optimizer experiments
2. Remove all the Website Optimizer scripts from your site
3. Create a new experiment as normal. New experiments are not vulnerable.

Updating the Website Optimizer Control Script Directly

1. Locate the Control Script on your site. It looks like this:

A/B Test Control Script
function utmx_section(){}function utmx(){}
(function(){var k=’XXXXXXXXXX’,d=document,l=d.location,c=d.cookie;function f(n){
if(c){var i=c.indexOf(n+’=');if(i>-1){var j=c.indexOf(‘;’,i);return c.substring(i+n.
length+1,j<0?c.length:j)}}}var x=f('__utmx'),xx=f('__utmxx'),h=l.hash;
d.write('’)})();
utmx(“url”,’A/B’);
Multivariate Test Control Script
function utmx_section(){}function utmx(){}
(function(){var k=’XXXXXXXXXX’,d=document,l=d.location,c=d.cookie;function f(n){
if(c){var i=c.indexOf(n+’=');if(i>-1){var j=c.indexOf(‘;’,i);return c.substring(i+n.
length+1,j<0?c.length:j)}}}var x=f('__utmx'),xx=f('__utmxx'),h=l.hash;
d.write('’)})();

2. Locate the following in the Control Script: return c.substring(…
3. Modify the following line as shown:
BEFORE: return c.substring(i+n.length+1,j<0?c.length:j)
FIXED: return escape(c.substring(i+n.length+1,j<0?c.length:j))
Make sure to include the final closing parenthesis “)”

Fixed A/B Control Script
function utmx_section(){}function utmx(){} (function(){var k=’XXXXXXXXXX’,d=document,l=d.location,c=d.cookie;function f(n){ if(c){var i=c.indexOf(n+’=');if(i>-1){var j=c.indexOf(‘;’,i);
return escape(c.substring(i+n.length+1,j<0?c.length:j))}}}
var x=f('__utmx'),xx=f('__utmxx'),h=l.hash; d.write('’)})();
utmx(“url”,’A/B’);

Fixed Multivariate Control Script
function utmx_section(){}function utmx(){}
(function(){var k=’XXXXXXXXXX’,d=document,l=d.location,c=d.cookie;function f(n){
if(c){var i=c.indexOf(n+’=');if(i>-1){var j=c.indexOf(‘;’,i);
return escape(c.substring(i+n.length+1,j<0?c.length:j))}}}
var x=f('__utmx'),xx=f('__utmxx'),h=l.hash; d.write('’)})();

Note that the k=XXXXXXXXX line in the above Control Script examples is a placeholder.

Your experiment will continue as normal after you’ve made this update. There’s no need to pause or restart the experiment.

We’re committed to keeping Website Optimizer secure, and we’re deeply sorry for this issue. We will continue to work hard to prevent future vulnerabilities.

Sincerely,
Trevor
Google Website Optimizer Team

Email Preferences: You have received this mandatory email service announcement to update you about important changes to your Google Website Optimizer product or account.

Copyright 2010. Google is a trademark of Google Inc. All other company and product names may be trademarks of the respective companies with which they are associated.

Email from: websiteoptimizer-noreply@google.com

Submit URLs to Google with Fetch as Googlebot


Official Google Webmaster Central Blog







Submit URLs to Google with Fetch as Googlebot
Posted: 03 Aug 2011 08:22 AM PDT
Webmaster Level: All
The Fetch as Googlebot feature in Webmaster Tools now provides a way to submit new and updated URLs to Google for indexing. After you fetch a URL as Googlebot, if the fetch is successful, you’ll now see the option to submit that URL to our index. When you submit a URL in this way Googlebot will crawl the URL, usually within a day. We’ll then consider it for inclusion in our index. Note that we don’t guarantee that every URL submitted in this way will be indexed; we’ll still use our regular processes—the same ones we use on URLs discovered in any other way—to evaluate whether a URL belongs in our index.

This new functionality may help you in several situations: if you’ve just launched a new site, or added some key new pages, you can ask Googlebot to find and crawl them immediately rather than waiting for us to discover them naturally. You can also submit URLs that are already indexed in order to refresh them, say if you’ve updated some key content for the event you’re hosting this weekend and want to make sure we see it in time. It could also help if you’ve accidentally published information that you didn’t mean to, and want to update our cached version after you’ve removed the information from your site.

How to submit a URL

First, use Diagnostics > Fetch As Googlebot to fetch the URL you want to submit to Google. If the URL is successfully fetched you’ll see a new “Submit to index” link appear next to the fetched URL.

 
Once you click “Submit to index” you’ll see a dialog box that allows you to choose whether you want to submit only the one URL, or that URL and all its linked pages.


When submitting individual URLs, we have a maximum limit of 50 submissions per week; when submitting URLs with all linked pages, the limit is 10 submissions per month. You can see how many submissions you have left on the Fetch as Googlebot page. Any URL submitted should point to content that would be suitable for Google Web Search, so if you’re trying to submit images or videos you should use Sitemaps instead.

Submit URLs to Google without verifying

In conjunction with this update to Fetch as Googlebot, we’ve also updated the public “Add your URL to Google” form. It’s now the Crawl URL form. It has the same quota limits for submitting pages to the index as the Fetch as Googlebot feature but doesn’t require verifying ownership of the site in question, so you can submit any URLs that you want crawled and indexed.


Note that Googlebot is already pretty good about finding and crawling new content in a timely fashion, so don’t feel obligated to use this tool for every change or update on your site. But if you’ve got a URL whose crawling or indexing you want to speed up, consider submitting it using the Crawl URL form or the updated Fetch as Googlebot feature in Webmaster Tools. Feel free to comment here or visit our Webmaster Help Forum if you have more detailed questions.

Written by Jonathan Simon & Susan Moskwa, Webmaster Trends Analysts

Microsoft Magic

MAGIC #1

An Indian found that nobody can create a FOLDER anywhere on

the Computer which can be named as “CON“. This is

something funny and inexplicable? At Microsoft the whole

Team, couldn’t answer why this happened!

TRY IT NOW, IT WILL NOT CREATE A “CON”

FOLDER

MAGIC #2

For those of you using Windows, do the following:

1.) Open an empty notepad file

2.) Type “Bush hid the facts” (without the quotes)

3.) Save it as whatever you want.

4.) Close it, and re-open it.

Noticed the weird bug?
No one can explain!

MAGIC #3

Again this is something funny and can’t be explained?

At Microsoft the whole Team, including Bill Gates, couldn’t answer why this happened!

It was discovered by a Brazilian. Try it out yourself?

>> Open Microsoft Word and type

=rand (200, 99)

And then press ENTER

And see the

magic?..!

Magic #4

Did you know that a flight number from one of the planes that hit one
of the two WTC towers on 9/11 was Q33N. In Notepad / word pad or MS
Word, type that flight number i.e. Q33N. Increase the font size to 72.
Change the font to Wingdings. ….. u will be amazed by the
findings!!!…………………..

Google Add URL

Google Add URL = http://www.google.com/addurl.html (Apply for all below domains)

http://www.google.ad

http://www.google.ae

http://www.google.com.af

http://www.google.com.ag

http://www.google.com.ai

http://www.google.am

http://www.google.it.ao

http://www.google.com.ar

http://www.google.as

http://www.google.at

http://www.google.com.au

http://www.google.az

http://www.google.ba

http://www.google.com.bd

http://www.google.be

http://www.google.bg

http://www.google.com.bh

http://www.google.bi

http://www.google.bj

http://www.google.com.bn

http://www.google.com.bo

http://www.google.com.br

http://www.google.bs

http://www.google.co.bw

http://www.google.com.by

http://www.google.com.bz

http://www.google.ca

http://www.google.cd

http://www.google.cf

http://www.google.cg

http://www.google.ch

http://www.google.ci

http://www.google.co.ck

http://www.google.cl

http://www.google.cn

http://www.google.com.co

http://www.google.co.cr

http://www.google.com.cu

http://www.google.cz

http://www.google.de

http://www.google.dj

http://www.google.dk

http://www.google.dm

http://www.google.com.do

http://www.google.dz

http://www.google.com.ec

http://www.google.ee

http://www.google.com.eg

http://www.google.es

http://www.google.com.et

http://www.google.fi

http://www.google.com.fj

http://www.google.fm

http://www.google.fr

http://www.google.ge

http://www.google.gg

http://www.google.com.gh

http://www.google.com.gi

http://www.google.gl

http://www.google.gm

http://www.google.gp

http://www.google.gr

http://www.google.com.gt

http://www.google.gy

http://www.google.com.hk

http://www.google.hn

http://www.google.hr

http://www.google.ht

http://www.google.hu

http://www.google.co.id

http://www.google.ie

http://www.google.co.il

http://www.google.im

http://www.google.co.in

http://www.google.is

http://www.google.it

http://www.google.je

http://www.google.com.jm

http://www.google.jo

http://www.google.co.jp

http://www.google.co.ke

http://www.google.com.kh

http://www.google.ki

http://www.google.kg

http://www.google.co.kr

http://www.google.com.kw

http://www.google.kz

http://www.google.la

http://www.google.com.lb

http://www.google.li

http://www.google.lk

http://www.google.co.ls

http://www.google.lt

http://www.google.lu

http://www.google.lv

http://www.google.com.ly

http://www.google.co.ma

http://www.google.md

http://www.google.me

http://www.google.mg

http://www.google.mn

http://www.google.ms

http://www.google.com.mt

http://www.google.mu

http://www.google.mv

http://www.google.mw

http://www.google.com.mx

http://www.google.com.my

http://www.google.co.mz

http://www.google.com.na

http://www.google.com.nf

http://www.google.com.ng

http://www.google.com.ni

http://www.google.nl

http://www.google.no

http://www.google.com.np

http://www.google.nr

http://www.google.nu

http://www.google.co.nz

http://www.google.com.om

http://www.google.com.pa

http://www.google.com.pe

http://www.google.com.ph

http://www.google.com.pk

http://www.google.pl

http://www.google.pn

http://www.google.com.pr

http://www.google.pt

http://www.google.com.py

http://www.google.com.qa

http://www.google.ro

http://www.google.ru

http://www.google.rw

http://www.google.com.sa

http://www.google.com.sb

http://www.google.sc

http://www.google.se

http://www.google.com.sg

http://www.google.sh

http://www.google.si

http://www.google.sk

http://www.google.com.sl

http://www.google.sn

http://www.google.sm

http://www.google.st

http://www.google.com.sv

http://www.google.co.th

http://www.google.com.tj

http://www.google.tk

http://www.google.tl

http://www.google.tm

http://www.google.to

http://www.google.com.tr

http://www.google.tt

http://www.google.com.tw

http://www.google.co.tz

http://www.google.com.ua

http://www.google.co.ug

http://www.google.co.uk

http://www.google.com.uy

http://www.google.co.uz

http://www.google.com.vc

http://www.google.co.ve

http://www.google.vg

http://www.google.co.vi

http://www.google.com.vn

http://www.google.vu

http://www.google.ws

http://www.google.rs

http://www.google.co.za

http://www.google.co.zm

http://www.google.co.zw